Hi Lada, For a domain name that supports wildcard, I wonder whether that wouldn't be better as a separate type. I can imagine that in a lot of places a wildcard domain name isn't appropriate.
Thanks, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka > Sent: 29 March 2019 10:20 > To: NETMOD WG <[email protected]> > Subject: [netmod] 6991bis: domain-name > > Hi, > > as a follow-up to my comment during the NETMOD session, I want to propose > the following update to the the inet:domain-name type. The aim is to include > use cases that are currently rejected: > > - classless in-addr.arpa delegations [RFC 2317], i.e. labels like "128/26" > > - wildcards [RFC 4592], e.g. "*.example.net" > > OLD > > pattern > '((([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.)*' > + '([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.?)' > + '|\.'; > > NEW > > pattern > '((\*\.)?(([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-/_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.)*' > + '([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-/_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.?)' > + '|\.'; > > Lada > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka > Head, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
