On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > > The combination of these bullet items, and maybe other bullet items does not > make clear if there was any consensus in allowing (or maybe even preventing) > vendors from using a versioning system to keep track of NBC changes on other > (non-latest) branches of the model. I think I heard from multiple vendors > (outside of this meeting) that making NBC changes was needed on the > non-latest branches, whatever IETF or other SDOs decide. Has that sentiment > changed? > > If it is the case, the split between the requirements of SDO and the vendors > is inevitable. >
If there is a solution that can handle multiple branches, then the same solution should work for SDOs that choose to use only a single branch. I do not see why a split is inevitable. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
