> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Martin Bjorklund
> Sent: 02 April 2019 13:47
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [netmod] 6991bis: address-with-prefix-length
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you go back ~20 messages, my proposal was ip-address-prefix,
> > ipv4-address-prefix, and ipv6-address-prefix.
>
> Do we agree that this type really specifies two values in one? If so I think
> the
> "and" is useful.
Isn't an "IP prefix" made up of an "IP address" and a "prefix length"?
So, I think that the names above are probably right, or otherwise if you want
the "and" then perhaps it should be "ip-address-and-prefix-length" - which
seems clunky?
Thanks,
Rob
>
> Also note that the current text in RFC 6991 says:
>
> The ipv4-prefix type represents an IPv4 address prefix.
>
> so having a type ipv4-address-prefix for something that is not (only) an
> "ipv4 address prefix" is imo confusing.
>
>
> /martin
>
>
>
>
> >
> > /js
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:13:09AM +0000, tom petch wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeff Tantsura" <[email protected]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>; "Kristian Larsson" <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 11:09 PM
> > >
> > > What Kristian has proposed makes sense, in favor.
> > >
> > > <tp>
> > >
> > > Yes, I support this idea and we should be able to come up with a
> > > more user-friendly name; address-prefix or address-length ?
> > >
> > > Tom Petch
> > >
> > > p.s.
> > >
> > > identifier = (ALPHA / "_")
> > > *(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_" / "-" / ".")
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jeff
> > > On Apr 1, 2019, 1:09 PM -0700, Kristian Larsson
> > > <[email protected]>, wrote:
> > > > Hello Mahesh,
> > > >
> > > > On 2019-04-01 21:40, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Apr 1, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know that this type is convenient, esp. if you use it for
> > > > > > manual input, but I wonder if it really is good practice to
> > > > > > squeeze two values into one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree. The combination makes sense for CLI, but for modeling the
> > > address and prefix should be separate.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, then why do we have an ip-prefix data type at all? With the
> > > > same line of argument you apply, it should be split up.
> > > >
> > > > So you're the third person bringing up CLI. I don't get this at
> > > > all. I don't see how CLI are different from everything else. This
> > > > is about
> > > data
> > > > modeling and data modeling is about expressing the world in a data
> > > > modeling language. It's like painting a picture but instead of a
> > > > brush you have a schema language like YANG. What do you see?
> > > > Express it. It doesn't matter if the purpose is a CLI, a web page
> > > > or just exposing it via NETCONF for another system to consume.
> > > >
> > > > I think address-and-prefix-length is natural. JUNOS uses this format.
> > > XR
> > > > uses this format (for IPv6 at least). Nokia SROS uses this format.
> > > >
> > > > We have written a bunch of models where the lack of this IMHO
> > > > makes
> > > them
> > > > less elegant. I'd like for there to be an IETF standard data type
> > > > to make those models more elegant.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Kristian.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > netmod mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > --------
> > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > netmod mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > netmod mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >
> > --
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
