Y'all -- It looks like the text in 6021 around the ipv4-prefix is being... mis-read?
https://github.com/CESNET/libyang/issues/755 The libyang folk seem to be taking the prefix as the mask, rather than the prefix here? Canonizing should mean replacing anything in the host bits with 0's, so only the prefix is left, rather than converting all the prefix bits to 1's. We might need to clarify this with the libyang folk. 😊 /r _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
