Hi All,
In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8528#section-4, a below example is shown for
parent references,
"
+--rw interfaces
| +--rw interface* [name]
| ...
+--rw network-instances
+--rw network-instance* [name]
+--rw name
+--mp root
+--rw routing
...
"
Consider a simple case where the ietf-routing module and ietf-ospf module are
mounted as part of network-instance of a L3vpn. Also consider that for
ietf-ospf , it has some interface configuration as shown below.
This needs parent-references , since the interface configuration is in the
parent data-tree of mount-point.
module: ietf-ospf
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/
rt:control-plane-protocol:
+--rw ospf
+--rw areas
| +--rw area* [area-id]
| +--rw interfaces
| +--rw interface* [name]
| +--rw name if:interface-ref
Since the YANG library "under" the mount-point-instance has to be complete, I
was thinking that the YANG library under the mount-point will have the
"ietf-interfaces" YANG module. Since the "ietf-interfaces" module under the
network-instance mount-point may not make sense, the "conformance-type" for it
will be "import" instead of "implement".
Another statement though confuses me , where the argument of "presence"
statement of "shared-schema",
""The mounted schema together with the 'parent-reference'
make up the schema for this mount point.";" ==> Does this mean
that YANG Library of the mount-point-instance should not have "ietf-interfaces"
in this case ? This may make the client work complicated.
With Regards,
Rohit
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
