On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:23:05PM +0000, tom petch wrote: > > No way can I approach being Martin but .. > > this topic has been active on the 6man list and to some extent on the > main IETF list with one very active participant arguing that because > widely-used implementations allow something that the RFC does not > (making use of the 64 zero bits of fe80::/10) then the RFC is wrong and > should be changed. Happily this seems to be a minority view but, like a > hydra, the thread keeps coming back to life in another form see e.g. >
This is NOT this topic. Lets please keep this out of here. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
