Hi Tom, I don't think that there is an issue here. Copying Scott (as coordinator of IEEE YANG activities).
ieee802-dot1q-types.yang is developed as part of IEEE 802.1Qcp. A copy of the published module is available at https://github.com/YangModels/yang/blob/master/standard/ieee/published/802.1/ieee802-dot1q-types.yang, and that references "IEEE Std 802.1Q-2018, Bridges and Bridged Networks." I don't know if they have a registry for IEEE YANG modules. But my understanding is that the update rules for IEEE developed YANG modules are the same as IETF, i.e. currently following the rules defined in RFC 7950 chapter 11. draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang is progressing as https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model/. It is in Netmod WG LC. Thanks, Rob -----Original Message----- From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tom petch Sent: 21 August 2019 09:53 To: NetMod WG <[email protected]> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]> Subject: [netmod] import from another SDO Looking at draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-09 I see that it imports ieee802-dot1q-types { prefix dot1q-type; reference "IEEE Std 802.1Q-2017: Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks."; I have seen this before with draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang which I do not think progressed. So, what are the implications, in terms of progress, of evolution, of the different approaches of IEEE and IETF? Does the IEEE have the same ideas as us on registering modules, what updates are permissible and so on? Any ideas? Tom Petch _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
