On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:59 PM Juergen Schoenwaelder < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:20:44PM -0400, David Reid wrote: > > > > Has there been any work done on defining a method of converting yang > > > > modules to mib modules? > > > > > > Since YANG is way more flexible than SMIv2, this will only work if the > > > YANG language is heavily restricted to a subset that is mappable. My > > > recommendation is to not spent time on this. > > > > > > /js > > > > Some of the yang constructs that can't easily be mapped could be mapped > with some creativity. I think the subset that can't be mapped would be > relatively small. > > > > Yes, I stand corrected, you can probably even map everything somehow. > Whether such mappings result in _usable_ MIB module is going to be a > question for which answers will be subjective. > > /js > > Perhaps there would be value in defining a subset that could be reasonably mapped. I found a project that has a pyang module for yang to mib conversion: http://help.openclovis.com/index.php/Convert_YANG_to_MIB_model I was not able to get it to work, so I don't know how complete it is.
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
