+1, in addition, I am wondering whether this is something related to overlay topology model, if yes, how it is different from DC Fabric topology model defined in RFC8542?
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Varga 发送时间: 2019年8月28日 7:44 收件人: Dmytro Shytyi <ietf.dmy...@shytyi.net>; netmod <netmod@ietf.org> 主题: Re: [netmod] New Version draft-shytyi-netmod-vysm-02.txt as Working Group document. On 27/08/2019 18:03, Dmytro Shytyi wrote: > Dear All, > > I am one of the authors of ID VYSM and I would like to draw your > attention to the evolution of the draft > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shytyi-netmod-vysm-01.txt. > Recently we produced (but did not submitted yet) a new version of ID > (02) and I beleive it fits the netmod working group. > > We would be gratefull if you could suggest if the new version(02) of > the document could become an official work item of the WG? > If yes, could you please indicate which modifications must be > done in the document before submition. Hmm, looking over the model, it would seem there is quite a bit of overlap with RFC8345 -- to the point I believe the model could be formulated in terms of RFC8345 specialization: virtualization -> networks/network device/links/interfaces/switches/vms are probably a mix of node/termmination-point/link extensions with conjunction with supporting-{topology,node,link}. How would the draft relate to RFC8345? Should it perhaps call out it is a different take on the similar problem, specialized to a particular use-case? Regards, Robert (with RFC8345 co-author hat on) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
