Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Section 1. To make this document more enduring, I’d recommend qualifying the capabilities of xml2rfc (i.e., no line wrapping is done) to a version number. (2) Section 2. Is it worth saying that in addition to the primary target being <sourcecode> and <artwork> (xml2rfc tags), it is also anything authors currently put between “<CODE BEGINS> … <CODE ENDS>” (sometimes even when not using xml tooling for rendering the draft)? (3) Editorial nits: -- Section 2. Editorial. s/This work may be also be used/This work may also be used/. -- Section 4.2. Editorial. s/already YANG [RFC7950] modules are extracted/YANG [RFC7950] modules are already extracted/. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
