Andy, Whether all constraints on content in <config> parameter will not be evaluated in payload parsing phase, for example, a leaf’s value exceed range? Netconf server should treat it as a block data?
Another question: In edit-config processing phase, whether constraints on content in <config> parameter needs be evaluated? If yes, when configuration modification cause when condition is evaluated to false, the node tagged when will be automatically deleted by system. Then, in scene 2, whether different result would occur according different process order? ________________________________ 华为技术有限公司 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. [Company_logo] 个人签名：冯冲 手 机：13776612983 电子邮件：[email protected] 公司网址：www.huawei.com ________________________________ 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! 发件人: Andy Bierman [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2019年9月10日 10:19 收件人: Fengchong (frank) <[email protected]> 抄送: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Yangang <[email protected]> 主题: Re: [netmod] Please clarify implementation about ‘when’ On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 7:10 PM Fengchong (frank) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi andy, You only talk about the constraints on rpc operation’s parameter? Do you have any opinion about my question? 8.3.1 does not apply to leaf 'b'. The RPC parameter is called 'config'. It has no when-stmts to evaluate. Rob is correct. His example shows what 8.3.1 would cover. Andy ________________________________ 华为技术有限公司 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. [Company_logo] 个人签名：冯冲 手 机：13776612983 电子邮件：[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 公司网址：www.huawei.com<http://www.huawei.com> ________________________________ 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! 发件人: Andy Bierman [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 发送时间: 2019年9月10日 1:14 收件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 抄送: Fengchong (frank) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Yangang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 主题: Re: [netmod] Please clarify implementation about ‘when’ Hi, None of the operations that accept or return datastore contents expose the datastore objects in the RPC parameters. They are always anyxml or anydata. This means that there are no descendant data nodes defined at all according to the RPC operation and therefore the constraints on those nodes do not exist in the RPC operation either. On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 6:41 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Frank, My interpretation of what the expected behaviour is as follows. For “scene 1”, the config change is accepted because the result of the config datastore after the edit-config has been applied is valid. For “scene 2”, the config change is rejected because the result of the config datastore after the edit-config has been applied is invalid. My interpretation is that the block of text in 8.3.1 payload parsing is primary intended to refer to RFC input. E.g. if the RPC was defined something like below, then the ‘when’ rule in 8.3.1 would enforce that a zip-code can only be provided if the country is the USA. rpc rock-the-house { input { leaf country { type string; } leaf zip-code { when “../country = ‘usa’”; type string; } } } Thanks, Rob From: netmod <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Fengchong (frank) Sent: 06 September 2019 08:19 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Yangang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [netmod] Please clarify implementation about ‘when’ Hi all, In RFC7950 secton 8, several description about when： In section 8.2<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-8.2>. Configuration Data Modifications o If a request modifies a configuration data node such that any node's "when" expression becomes false, then the node in the data tree with the "when" expression is deleted by the server. In 8.3.1<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-8.3.1>. Payload Parsing o If data for a node tagged with "when" is present and the "when" condition evaluates to "false", the server MUST reply with an "unknown-element" <error-tag> in the <rpc-error>. In 8.3.2<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-8.3.2>. NETCONF <edit-config> Processing Modification requests for nodes tagged with "when", and the "when" condition evaluates to "false". In this case, the server MUST reply with an "unknown-element" <error-tag> in the <rpc-error>. YANG module： module foo { namespace “http://foo.com”; prefix “foo”; Leaf a {…} Leaf b { When “a = 10”; } } Scene 1: The first edit-config request: <edit-config> <target> <candidate/> </target> <config> <a xmlns= “http://foo.com”>3</a> </config> </edit-config> This request will set a = 3. The second request: <edit-config> <target> <candidate/> </target> <config> <a xmlns= “http://foo.com”>10</a> <b xmlns= “http://foo.com”>5</b> </config> </edit-config> According 8.3.1, in rpc payload parsing phase, the a’s value in candidate datastore is 3,so leaf b’s when condition is evaluated to false, server will report ‘unknown-element’ error. Is it expected by user? Scene 2: The first edit-config request: <edit-config> <target> <candidate/> </target> <config> <a xmlns= “http://foo.com”>10</a> </config> </edit-config> This request will set a = 10. The second request: <edit-config> <target> <candidate/> </target> <config> <a xmlns= “http://foo.com”>3</a> <b xmlns= “http://foo.com”>5</b> </config> </edit-config> According 8.3.1, in rpc payload parsing phase, the a’s value in candidate datastore is 10, so leaf b’s when condition is evaluated to true, server will accept this request in payload parsing phase. In edit-config request processing phase, if leaf a’s modification is processed firstly, the a’s value will be changed to 3, so the b’s when condition will be false, when server process b’s modification, b will be treated as unknown-element, the edit-config request will fail. If leaf b’s modification is processed firstly, server will accept this modification ,because b’s when condition is true, and when server process a’s modification , this modification will be accepted, and b’s when condition will be evaluated to false, leaf b will be deleted automatically, the edit-config request will be OK. How server should process this situation? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
