Hi Balazs, Is this for the NETMOD list, or should bugs be filed against the misbehaving tools?
Kent > On Oct 22, 2019, at 6:56 AM, Balázs Lengyel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > I tried testing the following statements: > > deviation /nacm:nacm/nacm:enable-nacm { > deviate add { > config false; } } > > deviation /nacm:nacm/nacm:rule-list { > deviate add { > min-elements 1; } } > > In nacm both the config and the min-elements are absent, so their default > meaning is true. I actually tried both add and replace in deviate. > I got rather confusing results whether the add/replace variant of deviate > should be accepted or rejected because the property already exists or does > not yet exist. > > Pyang 2.0.2 locally: > Config=false add-NOK replace-OK > Min-elements=1 add-OK replace-NOK > > YANG-Validator pyang 2.0 & confdc > Config=false add-OK replace-OK > Min-elements=1 add-OK replace-NOK > > YANG-Validator yanglint > Config=false add-OK replace-OK > Min-elements=1 add-OK replace-OK > > IMHO the tools should always check the property, so even if the statement is > not present the properties config=false and min-elements=0 ARE present. So > add should be rejected and replace accepted. > > Regards Balazs > > -- > Balazs Lengyel Senior Specialist > Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
