Hi Qin, All, Yes, draft-sambo-netmod-yang-fsm generalizes the YANG Finite State Machine approach with a description of possible Use Cases. In addition, draft-sambo-ccamp-yang-fsm-transponder-reconf describes in more detail a specific Use Case. Since there is interest on this topic and additional applications can be considered, it would be great to work together and start a design team on it.
Best Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Qin Wu Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 4:31 PM To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; Lou Berger <[email protected]>; wangzitao <[email protected]> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-03.txt Thanks Rob, just to remind draft-sambo-opsawg-ccamp-supa-ext-yang-fsm has been replaced by draft-sambo-netmod-yang-fsm-05 back in October 2017 and has been discussed twice before in the past netmod meetings. I am happy to work with authors of three drafts to see how to rationalize these common interests effort. -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2019年10月23日 21:32 收件人: Qin Wu <[email protected]>; Lou Berger <[email protected]>; wangzitao <[email protected]> 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: RE: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-03.txt Hi Qin, Lou, There it also draft-sambo-opsawg-ccamp-supa-ext-yang-fsm which, unless I am mistaken, also seems to be targeting the same area. It seems like there is definitely interest in this area. It would be nice if there could be a single standard solution, but perhaps the use cases are different enough that this doesn't make sense? Thanks, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Qin Wu > Sent: 23 October 2019 14:15 > To: Lou Berger <[email protected]>; wangzitao <[email protected]> > Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]>; draft-bryskin-netconf- > [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-wwx-netmod-event- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for > draft-wwx-netmod-event- yang-03.txt > > Lou: > I am not against to harmonize with > draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-yang > and actually both have already shared a lot of commonality on > motivation and use cases but the model proposed in draft-wwx reduce > its complexity and propose a more simple model design. > A quick question to chair: > Do you think we should start from complex advanced generalized model > with many features which not sure can be supported, or from simple > generic model in which the mechanism has been generalized in previous > several revisions and clarify the relationship with many related > standardized work such as YANG Push, Event MIB. > > If clarifying the relationship with Event MIB is a concern, we could > remove it since Event MIB is just one of work that motivates to bring > this work up, in addition, hardware management model defined in > RFC8348 also clarify relationship with ENTITY-MIB, do you think > hardware management is something specific to MIB? > > If I am wrong, please correct me. > Regards! > -Qin > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Lou Berger [mailto:[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2019年10月22日 20:38 > 收件人: wangzitao <[email protected]> > 抄送: [email protected]; NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]>; draft- > [email protected]; draft-bryskin-netconf-automation- > [email protected] > 主题: Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-wwx-netmod-event- > yang-03.txt > > Michael/Authors/WG, > > Thank you for this work. One of the questions in looking at this > draft is the relationship to this draft to other individual work that > has been discussed in the WG, > notablyhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bryskin- > netconf-automation-yang . In looking at both drafts, I read it as > that the latter provides general infrastructure for > event-condition-actions (ECAs). I'm less sure about your draft, in > reading it it too seems aimed at a general infrastructure, but it also > seems tailored to a specific set of ECAs that are aligned with the EVEN-MIB. > > What is your/the authors intent? > > If the former, perhaps it would be good for both sets of authors to > (at least try to) work together to come up with with a merged > document? If the latter, does it make sense to adjust your draft to > document your use case using the more general mechanisms of the other draft? > > What do you think? > > Please let me know if you think I'm misreading or missed something here. > > Thanks, > Lou > > On 10/15/2019 2:17 AM, wangzitao wrote: > > Dear Working Group, > > > > As you recall that we presented the "draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-02" > > in > the last NETMOD session and got a good number of supports when the > chair polled in the room. > > Recently we have a minor update on the draft based on Montreal > > meeting > discussion, adding an appendix section to introduce how to reuse the > "trigger-grouping", more details please review the document. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-03 > > > > We believe this draft is stable enough and would like to ask for WG > adoption. > > > > Comments and suggestion are welcome! > > > > Best Regards! > > -Michael(on behalf of authors) > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > 发送时间: 2019年10月15日 14:14 > > 收件人: wangzitao <[email protected]>; Chongfeng Xie > > <[email protected]>; Qin Wu <[email protected]>; wangzitao > > <[email protected]>; Qin Wu <[email protected]> > > 主题: New Version Notification for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-03.txt > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-03.txt > > has been successfully submitted by Michael Wang and posted to the > > IETF > repository. > > > > Name: draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang > > Revision: 03 > > Title: A YANG Data model for Policy based Event Management > > Document date: 2019-10-13 > > Group: Individual Submission > > Pages: 30 > > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wwx-netmod- > event-yang-03.txt > > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wwx-netmod-event- > yang/ > > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang- > 03 > > Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wwx-netmod- > event-yang > > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wwx-netmod- > event-yang-03 > > > > Abstract: > > [RFC8328] defines a policy-based management framework that allow > > definition of a data model to be used to represent high-level, > > possibly network-wide policies. This document defines an YANG data > > model for the policy based event management [RFC7950]. The policy > > based Event YANG provides the ability for the network management > > function (within a controller, an orchestrator, or a network > element) > > to control the configuration and monitor state change on the network > > element and take simple and instant action when a trigger condition > > on the system state is met. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
