Hi Martin, One comment below.
> -----Original Message----- > From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Martin Bjorklund > Sent: 18 November 2019 19:54 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file- > format-04 > > Balázs Lengyel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > [RW] <snipped> > > > > BALAZS3: People explicitly asked for a short, simple solution, so > > reusing the well-known module-file-naming format seemed logical, and > > nobody misunderstood it till now. > > I would really like to avoid creating a list with 2 separate leaf's: > > longer, more complex. It goes against the express wishes of other > > group members. > > If you prefer we can drop the file extension. > > Yes I think this is better. > > > IMHO it will look strange. > > Perhaps this document will set the standard for future references to > modules, so that this short-hand notation is used in more places, rather > than separate name / revision leafs... > [RW] The module versioning draft (draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning) allows modules to be identified by their name and revision-label, e.g. from section 3.3: If a revision has an associated revision label, then it may be used instead of the revision date in two places: In an "rev:revision-or-derived" extension statement argument. In the filename of a YANG module, where it takes the form: module- or-submodule-name ['@' revision-label] ( '.yang' / '.yin' ) Obviously the revision label could be a YANG semver, e.g. it would be nice if we were allowed strings like: "[email protected]" rather than forcing it to use the revision date. The module versioning draft hasn't been adopted as a WG item yet, but I'm hoping that this can be considered, along with the other drafts soon. Thanks, Rob > BTW, you mentioned in your presentation of draft-ietf-netconf- > notification-capabilities that this doc will be impacted by changes in > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format. I think that this is ok and > we continue the process for this document. > The RFC editor won't publish it until instance-file-format is done, so > there is time to fix the examples. > > > /martin > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
