As an author/editor/DT member, I support adoption.  Note: obviously adoption 
doesn’t mean they’re final, and we are absolutely looking for the WG to provide 
into, especially on the newer work around version selection and schema 
comparison.

Joe

> On Mar 2, 2020, at 17:29, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> We'd like to start a two week adoption call for the set of documents 
> described below by Rob.  To be specific, this includes
> 1) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03
> 2) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01
> 3) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-semver-01
> 4) draft-rwilton-netmod-yang-packages-03
> 5) draft-wilton-netmod-yang-ver-selection-02
> 6) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
> 
> The adoption call ends in two weeks, on March 16.  
> 
> Please voice your support or objections on list.  While we prefer to adopt as 
> a set, objections on specific documents are acceptable.
> 
> Netmod Chairs
> 
> On 2/29/2020 2:21 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>> Netmod chairs,
>> 
>> The version selection draft draft-wilton-netmod-yang-ver-selection-02 is now 
>> posted.  With that, the YANG versioning design team would like to please 
>> request you make an WG adoption call for these documents.
>> 
>> The updated full list is:
>> 
>> 1) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03
>>   - Solution overview, updated since 106 to cover updates to version 
>> selection and schema comparison drafts.
>> 
>> 2) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01
>>   - Base module versioning solution, unchanged from the version presented at 
>> 106.
>> 
>> 3) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-semver-01
>>   - YANG Semantic version numbers, unchanged from the version presented at 
>> 106.
>> 
>> 4) draft-rwilton-netmod-yang-packages-03
>>   - YANG packages draft, updated since 106
>>   
>> 5) draft-wilton-netmod-yang-ver-selection-02
>>   - Version selection, updated since 106, as per notes below
>> 
>> 6) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
>>   - Schema comparison tooling, unchanged from the version presented at 106.
>> 
>> The main changes to the version selection draft are:
>>   - We have tried to simplify the model, but at the same time give servers 
>> more flexibility about how they implement version selection and what it can 
>> be used for.  E.g. if the server wants to allow a client to choose between 
>> different schema versions, but require that all clients use the same schema 
>> version, that is now possible
>>   - The draft explicitly disallows schema-selection happening mid-session
>>   - The solution allows the server to require clients to configure 
>> schema-sets before they are used
>>   - The solution provides more information about which schema-sets are 
>> compatible with each other
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Rob
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to