Kent

Not Ready

I thought that so obvious that it was not worth saying:-)

e.g.
IANA considerations does not register the namespace so there is no module
Security Considerations does not use template (which other grouping modules 
such as Kent's do)
No YANG version
Wrong prefix for ietf-yang-types
No reference clause for yang types
A wholesale lack of YANG reference clauses; perhaps half a dozen needed
No Normative reference for yang-types
Insufficient information for IANA - I infer they are being asked to create a 
registry but details seem lacking compared to the requirements in RFC8126

At which point I stop and await a fresh revision before having another go.

Tom Petch

________________________________________
From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen 
<kent+i...@watsen.net>
Sent: 26 March 2020 18:46

Dear All,

This WGLC has received zero responses, which is insufficient to progress the 
document at this time.  The WGLC is therefore being extended  for another week, 
now ending April 1st (the day before our Virtual Meeting on April 2nd).

Again, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is 
ready for publication", are welcomed.  This is useful and important, even from 
authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.

FWIW, the YANG Doctor review was completed on 3/23 (thanks Mahesh) with the 
“Ready with Nits” status: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04-yangdoctors-lc-jethanandani-2020-03-23.

Kent // as shepherd and co-chair



On Mar 9, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Kent Watsen 
<kent+i...@watsen.net<mailto:kent+i...@watsen.net>> wrote:

This message begins an almost two-week WGLC for 
draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04 ending on March 22nd (the day before the 
NETMOD sessions).  Here is a direct link to the HTML version of the draft:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready 
for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from 
authors. Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.

Thank you,
NETMOD Chairs

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to