As I understand that works if you use Xml2Rfc v3 only. Balazs -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> Sent: 2020. március 31., kedd 9:36 To: Kent Watsen <k...@watsen.net> Cc: Erik Auerswald <auers...@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>; Balázs Lengyel <balazs.leng...@ericsson.com>; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] rfcstrip does not work on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12
Oh, and you can find examples for markers=“true” in the published RFCs rfc8650.xml rfc8652.xml rfc8675.xml rfc8676.xml rfc8681.xml rfc8682.xml rfc8695.xml rfc8696.xml rfc8748.xml So this is no longer just a proposal, as the below draft seems to suggest. Grüße, Carsten > On 2020-03-31, at 09:22, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > > On 2020-03-31, at 01:47, Kent Watsen <k...@watsen.net> wrote: >> >> I thought someone said that `xml2rfc` was going to support a “markers” >> attribute for the <sourcecode> element, but I don’t see that here yet: >> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=2558e5eb-798ceda8-2558a570-86a1150bc3ba-91f9e8a7be6cf53c&q=1&e=7c165797-25c3-4d3e-8bbc-f14b6f8c7cf7&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Frfc-format%2Fdraft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fdraft-iab-rfc7991bis.xml%23L8514. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-10#section-3.1.22 > > Grüße, Carsten >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
