On 2020-04-01, at 12:20, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Another, possibly more pragmatic, suggestion would be the change both > definitions to accept either “:” or “-“. I.e. the pattern statement would > become: "[0-9a-fA-F]{2}([-:][0-9a-fA-F]{2}){5}"
This isn’t backwards-compatible either? Or would that only be done for future modules? I don’t see the gain, but I see a lot of pain. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
