Hi, I just want to confirm that all the proposed documentation procedures using new extensions are limited in scope to published modules only, and not applied to unpublished modules (terms defined in RFC 8407).
IMO it would be harmful to module usability to assign revision-labels or include revision-related extensions in unpublished modules (e.g., Internet Drafts). Consider how cluttered and confusing the client-server modules would be if the 50+ NBC changes and versions were tracked through all the I-Ds. For IETF modules, the first usage of the revision-label should be in the initial RFC, and be set to 1.0.0. If the RFC is ever republished then one can expect to find an updated revision-label and possibly extensions tracking NBC changes. Andy
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
