Hi,

This errata is correct and should be accepted.


/martin


RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
> "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6078
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Michal Vasko <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 6.4.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    For example, consider the following definition:
> 
>      leaf lxiv {
>        type decimal64 {
>          fraction-digits 18;
>        }
>        must ". <= 10";
>      }
> 
>    An instance of the "lxiv" leaf having the value of
>    10.0000000000000001 will then successfully pass validation.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    For example, consider the following definition:
> 
>      leaf lxiv {
>        type decimal64 {
>          fraction-digits 18;
>        }
>        must ". <= 9";
>      }
> 
>    An instance of the "lxiv" leaf having the value of
>    9.0000000000000001 will then successfully pass validation.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Value 10.0000000000000001 is not a valid decimal64 value with 18 fraction 
> digits as per Section 9.3.4.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
> Publication Date    : August 2016
> Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to