Hi, There was a discussion<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/?q=%22Interpreting%20revision%20labels%20as%20YANG%20semantic%20version%20numbers%22> on the need to have an extension which specifies which versioning scheme a module is using.
The authors have identified 2 options: 1. One extension statement with a parameter which specifies the scheme being used. E.g. revision-label-schema(ietf-yang-semver), revision-label-schema(sdoX-yang). We’d need the parameter to be registered with IANA. 2. One extension statement per revision-scheme. E.g. revision-label-scheme-ietf-yang-semver, revision-label-scheme-sdoX-yang. The authors have a preference for option 1, we believe it makes things simpler. We would like to hear from the WG if there’s any concerns, suggestions etc. Regards, Reshad.
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
