Are there any other comments on the proposed resolution of this erratum? Regards, Rob
> -----Original Message----- > From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Martin Björklund > Sent: 28 April 2020 16:47 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [netmod] Erratum 5514 on NMDA [RFC 8342] > > "Rob Wilton \(rwilton\)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is one open erratum on NMDA from 2018 that I would like to > > process. > > > > The erratum is here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5514 > > > > There has been quite a lot of discussion on this erratum previously on > > the NETMOD alias. The last email in the thread was > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/LHJZmf5gtESX6Nobwst0OwXbGG4/ > > > > >From my reading of the discussion, I don't think that there is clear > > >WG consensus between the two competing concerns: > > (1) The origin for any top-level configuration data nodes must be > > specified (section 7, YANG annotation definition). > > (2) The origin applies to all configuration nodes except non-presence > > containers (section 5.3.4). > > > > Hence my proposal is to mark this as "Hold for Document Update" with > > Kent's proposed resolution of changing the description in the YANG > > model. > > > > OLD: > > The origin for any top-level configuration data nodes must be > > specified. > > > > NEW: > > The origin for any top-level configuration data nodes, except > > non-presence containers, must be specified. > > > > For reference, this will mean that the extension [NEW] is defined as: > > > > md:annotation origin { > > type origin-ref; > > description > > "The 'origin' annotation can be present on any configuration > > data node in the operational state datastore. It specifies > > from where the node originated. If not specified for a given > > configuration data node, then the origin is the same as the > > origin of its parent node in the data tree. The origin for > > any top-level configuration data nodes, except non-presence > > containers, must be specified."; > > } > > > > Please can you let me know if you support or object to this > > resolution. I'll leave it a week to see if there is consensus before > > processing the erratum. > > I think this is ok. > > > /martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
