I'm fine with either J1 or J2.

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2020-06-10, 5:36 PM, "netmod on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke)" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:


    >> 
    >> ###########
    >> Option J1
    >> ###########
    >> use the following suffixes:
    >> _non_compatible  (instead of the old "M", for an NBC change)
    >> _compatible (instead of the old "m", for a BC change)
    >> 
    >> e.g. for NBC:
    >> 1.1.0 -> 1.1.1_non_compatible
    >> e.g. for BC:
    >> 1.1.0 -> 1.1.1_compatible
    > 
    > I like this.  It clearly shows what is meant.  No special context or
    > knowledge is needed to understand the meaning, or at least to understand
    > that trouble might lie ahead.

    I like this, too, but I like J2 a bit better as I don’t like the double 
‘_’.  That said, I see your point about what the eye distinguishes.

    Still, I can live with both, but I prefer J2.

    > 
    >> ###########
    >> Option J2
    >> ###########
    >> - same as J1, just one fewer underscore
    >> 
    >> e.g. for NBC:
    >> 1.1.0 -> 1.1.1_noncompatible
    >> e.g. for BC:
    >> 1.1.0 -> 1.1.1_compatible
    > 
    > I like this a little bit less than J1, because it is a little bit less
    > easy to distinguish between the two words.

    Joe

    _______________________________________________
    netmod mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to