Hi guys, In the latest working copy of the YANG Semver draft we added some text in section 5 about how to select revision labels for modules that are under development, or for RFCs that are churning (i.e. bis versions).
https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/blob/master/yang-semver/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver.txt I think we probably need to require that same information for any revision label scheme. I'd suggest we put something along these lines into the module-versioning draft: Any revision label scheme MUST describe how labels are selected for new YANG modules that are under development, and how labels are selected for modules in IETF RFCs that are being updated (e.g. a "bis" version is under development). (should we drop the "in IETF RFCs" ? ) Jason
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
