diff-04 should address the wglc comments

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04
 
<https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04>

so we will progress to iesg.

> On Mar 8, 2020, at 17:10, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This working group last call completed on March 2nd.
> 
> Some corrections, and adjustments were requested in the discussion
> between Juergen and Alex. 
> 
> While the last call window did not see a lot of postive or negative
> support it aligns well with the dicussion at the last meeting on
> readiness to advance. I think we can call consensus on this point.
> 
> if a draft 04 appears shortly addressing the changes that were made I
> think we can move it along.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> joel
> 
> On 2/17/20 11:42, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> This was supposed to get processed shortly after IETF 106, however I lost 
>> track of it. We are therefore running a 2 week WGLC on 
>> draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/
>> 
>> the 02 - 03 diff is available here:
>> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-02&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03
>> 
>> Please send email to the list indicating your support or concerns.
>> 
>> This WGLC will conclude Monday March 2nd.
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>> 
> <pEpkey.asc>_______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to