From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder
<[email protected]>
Sent: 17 July 2020 20:18
- It is not clear how commonly useful these types are, the WG was
pretty silent about this proposal.
- On the technical side, it is unclear whether data is represented
with percent escapes resolved or not.
- Proposal: do not add these typedefs since their use seems rather
specific
<tp>
I am starting to see the use of typedef uri as a way of referencing an entity
in TEAS YANG modules following on from its use in one of the routing RFC (which
I cannot lay my hands on just now) so it is possible that uri is about to catch
on but I do not understand why they have chosen it nor what scheme it will be.
I have never seen much use of it in SMI.
Tom Petch
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
