But then perhaps draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05 needs to be updated or you need to use a grouping. I think we should not have overlapping work in different documents.
/js On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:54:43PM +0000, Qin Wu wrote: > That is a good option, but draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05 only define > grouping, there is typedef for longitude and latitude, altitude. > > -Qin > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2020年7月30日 21:32 > 收件人: Qin Wu <[email protected]> > 抄送: [email protected] > 主题: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, > yang:country-code > > But there is draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05... What about using the types > defined in there? > > /js > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:28:17PM +0000, Qin Wu wrote: > > See geolocation definition in draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-22 which defines > > longitude and latitude, altitude. > > I know it is beneficial for future document to import these types from > > rfc6991bis instead of from te topo model. > > > > -Qin > > -----邮件原件----- > > 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder > > 发送时间: 2020年7月18日 3:16 > > 收件人: [email protected] > > 主题: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, > > yang:postal-code, yang:country-code > > > > - It was suggested to add types for longitude, latitude, postal > > code, country-code. Do we go there or do we leave these for other > > modules to define? It seems such definitions should go into > > draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location. > > > > - Geo location is covered by draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location > > (so do nothing). > > > > - For country codes, there is ISO 3166, which defines two-letter, > > three-letter, and numeric country codes. I assume people wanted > > two-letter codes (as used in the DNS), i.e. they want DE and not > > DEU. But note that it is GB and not UK, i.e., what we commonly > > use in the DNS may not be exactly ISO 3166. (The devil is always > > in the details.) > > > > - For postal codes, it is unclear what the requirements are or what > > a proper definition for postal codes is. It is not entirely clear > > what the authoritative definition of the format of postal codes > > is, perhaps the Universal Postal Union. > > > > - Options: (i) do nothing or (ii) add a country code definition > > only or (iii) add both a country code definition and a postal > > code definition (which might be to some extend vague) > > > > - Proposal: do nothing > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
