Correction.
Some authors replied:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”.
While others replied:
"No, I'm not aware of any non-disclosed IPR that applies to this draft."
K.
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you, authors.
>
> All authors responded with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this
> draft”.
>
> Kent (as co-chair)
>
>
>
>> On Nov 23, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Authors,
>>
>> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call on
>> the "yang-node-tags” draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both
>> that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new author, and
>> therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as follows:
>>
>>
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>>
>> Please state either:
>>
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>> appropriate.
>>
>> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you
>> contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel
>> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and
>> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
>> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>>
>> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>> and
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>> response.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
