Hi, I am not a co-author. I sent IPR statements at least twice.
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Andy On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 4:03 PM Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Qin, > > It's sub-optimal, but sufficient IMO. Please note you didn't respond > for yourself! > > we're still missing responses from: > > Qin Wu > Benoit Claise > Andy Bierman > > Thanks, > > Lou > > On 12/7/2020 8:46 PM, Qin Wu wrote: > > > > Hi, Lou: > > > > Does forwarding confirmation from the authors to the list count? > > > > I have done this accidentally. If not, I will leave this to my coauthors. > > > > -Qin > > > > *发件人:*Lou Berger [mailto:[email protected]] > > *发送时间:*2020年12月8日6:20 > > *收件人:*Qin Wu <[email protected]>; Igor Bryskin <[email protected]>; > > Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>; Xufeng Liu > > <[email protected]>; Benoit Claise <[email protected]> > > *抄送:*NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]>; NetMod WG > > <[email protected]> > > *主题:*Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10 > > > > Authors, > > > > My apologies -- I failed to cc the WG on this. Can you please > > re-reply so that your response make it into the WG archive. > > > > Thank you! > > > > Lou > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > > *Subject: * > > > > > > > > Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10 > > > > *Date: * > > > > > > > > Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:08:59 -0500 > > > > *From: * > > > > > > > > Lou Berger <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > *To: * > > > > > > > > Qin Wu <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>, Igor Bryskin > > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>, Henk Birkholz > > <[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected]>, Xufeng Liu > > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>, Benoit > > Claise <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > *CC: * > > > > > > > > NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > Authors, > > > > Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption > > call on this draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both > > that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new > > author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as > > follows: > > > > > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > > > As part of preparation for WG Adoption: > > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > > > Please state either: > > > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > > appropriate. > > > > We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you > > contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel > > free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and > > would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to > > acknowledgments after WG adoption). > > > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > > and > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty > > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>. > > > > Thank you, > > NETMOD WG Chairs > > > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > > response. > > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
