Hi all. I'm working with an issue involving a deviate replace type and the problem is where the type should be resolved.
The scope in which the deviated property is resolved in is not explicitly stated in RFC 7950 (7.20.3.2). This would have impact when replacing the type, both when it's prefixed and when it's not. It does seem logical, and also in line with the rest of the RFC, to evaluate the replaced property in deviating module scope and not target module scope. Can deviating module scope be assumed? Should the RFC be clarified and the scope explicitly stated? BR /Peter Lundell
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
