On 22. 02. 21 11:11, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:00:36AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> But I thought that Jürgen's question was directed to the definition of >> backward compatibility in the semver context. > > No, the background is not semver here, it is "can we harmonize N > different existing definition of "0..100" to one. And it seems the > answer is "no", at least not in a backwards compatible way if people > picked different base types.
+1 Lada > > /js > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
