Well you were right, ipv4-address is used all over the place and it probably
shouldn't have been. Chalk another one up to sticking to the rules even when it
harms us.
Thanks,
Chris.
Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> writes:
On 09. 05. 21 1:26, Christian Hopps wrote:
How did we end up with "ipv4-address" being a zoned IPv4 address and
having to use the non-obvious "ipv4-address-no-zone" type to get the
IPv4 address type used by everyone, everywhere?
It was discussed e.g. in these threads:
*
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/?gbt=1&q=subject%3A%22draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01%20(20130204)%22
*
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/?gbt=1&index=gcMx6c-NFt2UCbtBFi7BsUWf0EU
Lada
I see that OpenConfig chose the opposite meaning for the "obvious" names
(i.e., you want zoned addresses you use "-zoned" types e.g.,
"ipv6-address-zoned").
Thanks,
Chris.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
