John Scudder via Datatracker <[email protected]> writes:
Nits: I think this document has the fewest nits per page of any document I’ve ever reviewed (kudos!), but there are still a few.
I believe I have benefited by being an early tester for Rob Wilton's automated grammar checker. :) I've fixed the remaining nits. Thanks, Chris.
Section 5.1:
In order to verify portability while developing this module the
following standards and standard APIs and were considered.
“and were” -> “were”
Section 5.1.1:
all the location values. As the URI is a string, all values are
specifies as strings and so are capable of as much precision as
“specifies” -> “specified”
Section 5.1.3:
position type "gml:pos" which is a sequence of "double" values. This
sequence of values represent coordinates in a given CRS. The CRS is
“represent” -> “represents” (because “sequence” is singular)
Earth based CRS as well as virtual CRS should also be representable
by the GML CRS types as well.
Drop “as well” (redundant with “also”).
Section 6.1:
This registry allocates names for standard geodetic systems. Often
these values are referred to using multiple names (e.g., full names
or multiple acronyms values). The intent of this registry is to
“Multiple acronym values” or better still “multiple acronyms”.
Appendix A:
description "A of locatable item";
Lose the “of”.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
