Sorry missed a couple in previous reply.
Christian Hopps <[email protected]> writes:
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <[email protected]> writes:Section 5.1.2 The following subsection suggests that there is a "heading" field in the W3C structure/API, but I don't see one listed in Figure 1.
Yes, there was even a blank line where it originally was, na errant D or something in vi. :) I've put it back.
Section 6.1 What are suitable references for the "me" and "mola-vik-1" geoedtic systems? I do not see how just the listed descriptions provide a "clear definition" even for the two coordinate values latitude/longitude.
I've included a reference for 'me', and removed mola-vik-1 b/c it was simply too hard to find a good reference for it.
Section 7 Thanks for using the template for security considerations for YANG models! I think that since some of the portions of the template do not apply, they can safely be removed. In particular, the "these are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability" lines can go, and the clause about "can have a negative effect on network operations" may be worth tweaking (network operations may not be the most likely thing to be impacted). I think it's also okay to drop the paragraph/sentence about RPCs.
Updated.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
