This is clearly a typo. The errata should be verified.
/martin RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, > "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6655 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Viktor Leijon <[email protected]> > > Section: 10.6.1.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > leaf flags { > type bits { > bit UP; > bit PROMISCUOUS > bit DISABLED; > } > } > > Corrected Text > -------------- > leaf flags { > type bits { > bit UP; > bit PROMISCUOUS; > bit DISABLED; > } > } > > Notes > ----- > The missing semicolon makes the YANG snippet invalid. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language > Publication Date : August 2016 > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Modeling > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
