Accepted, last comment. Balazs

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> 
Sent: 2021. október 7., csütörtök 23:45
To: Balázs Lengyel <[email protected]>
Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; Benoit Claise <[email protected]>;
[email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Kent Watsen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-20: (with COMMENT)

Hi Balázs,

Replies inline as well (where needed)

On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 10:43:28AM +0000, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Section 2
> 
>    Two formats are specified based on the XML and JSON YANG encodings.
>    Later, as other YANG encodings (e.g., CBOR) are defined, further
>    instance data formats may be specified.
> 
> I don't remember seeing a clear description of the specifics of these 
> two specified formats.  (I assume it's just "use the XML/JSON encoding 
> for YANG structures", but I don't remember that stated anywhere.)
> BALAZS: I added references to the relevant RFCs (7950, 7951, 8791) As the
model starts with a YAN structure, I included YANG Data Structure Extensions
RFC8791 too.

I was hoping for a statement like "The file formats are achieved by applying
the respective XML and JSON encoding rules for the YANG structure included
in this document."
BALAZS2: OK
Thanks for all the replies and updates,

Ben

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to