tom petch <[email protected]> writes: > The BFD WG are revising RFC9127 to add a new feature if-feature > "client-base-cfg-parms"; and make uses base-cfg-parms { conditional > thereon in module ietf-bfd-types. Reading and re-reading RFC7950, > especially about mandatory and top-level, I am not convinced that > this is legal.
Sorry, I don't get the problem - nothing in the "base-cfg-parms" grouping is mandatory. Why do you think this might be illegal? Lada > The module bfd-types is imported by a number of other modules such > as OSPF, RIP, PIM so it is also a question if e.g. a leaf can be > made mandatory by its usage in another module. I raised this on the > BFD list and the WG Chair tells me that this is a violation of the > intent of the RFC, 7950, but that it has been reviewed by YANG > doctors and is probably the best fix. > > If YANG Doctors collectively say that this violation is ok, then I think that > such a statement needs to appear on the Netmod WG list. > > I think that there are a lot of other editorial changes needed to 9127-bis to > make it legal but they can come later. The I-D is in WG Last Call ending > 20Dec2021 > > Tom Petch > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
