On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:51:48PM +0000, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote: > I wonder if having all the system config appear in intended and operational > may be annoying. We didn't want to pollute running with 100s/1000s of lines > of unreferenced system config. So maybe putting all that in intended & > operational is also ugly ? >
The applied config, part of operational, is the config that is actually used by the device. RFC 8342 has the details. > We should have *some* way that a client can retrieve system configuration > though. > > Some potential options (without system flowing 100% of its contents into > intended): > a) <system> DS that can be read (but doesn't flow into intended or > operational) > b) a "with-system" extension (like "with-defaults"). Returns a merge of > running+system (or candidate+system, or intended+system). You want to rewrite RFC 8342? > Maybe we'd also want (or maybe want instead) is a way to see *referenced* > system config (either on its own, or merged with another DS). The 'referenced system config' has to be in running since otherwise it can't be referenced. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
