Hi Jason,

> The primary <system> config use cases I see aren't so much interfaces, cards, 
> etc. It is more for things like built in qos profiles and other handy policy 
> objects that are more static (e.g. like Kent's JUNOS examples he has 
> described).  I'm not necessarily saying we preclude some of the 
> resource-based dynamic system config proposed in the draft, but maybe those 
> parts are more confusing/contentious.

I agree about the primary focus being on the “shared objects”…at least, that’s 
90% of what’s in the JUNOS junos-defaults “datastore” (in quotes because it’s 
not really a datastore).

K.


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to