On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 01:14:17PM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote: > > Right, and in both cases, the idea was that <running> contains all > data needed for the transformation into <intended>. So a client that > wants to do "offline" validation would need the data + the > transformation algorithms. But no additional data. >
Having to know proprietary transformation algorithms really kills the idea of interoperable offline validation. It does not really get any worse if transformation algorithms merge in additional definitions. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
