Hi, all
I have read the document and support the publication of this work.
I have only one comment: It seems that Table 2 doesn’t list all the types 
defined in “ietf-inet-types” YANG module, e.g., protocol-number, 
ip-address-link-local, ip-address-and-prefix… Should this be fixed?

Best Regards,
Qiufang

From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 6:43 AM
To: Reshad Rahman <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11

Thank you Reshad for your reply.

All, the WGLC is set to close in three days, but first there needs to be more 
responses…can others provide comments too?   Especially authors of other drafts 
in progress ;)

Thanks,
Kent  (and Lou)



On Feb 14, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Reshad Rahman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I have reviewed this document, no concerns. I believe it is ready for 
publication.

Regards,
Reshad.

On Thursday, February 3, 2022, 09:54:23 PM EST, Kent Watsen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Dear NETMOD WG,

This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11 ending 
on Friday, February 18th.  Here is a direct link to the HTML version of the 
draft:

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11.html

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready 
for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from 
authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.

Thank you,
Kent (as co-chair)

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to