On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:49:26PM -0700, IETF Secretariat wrote: > > The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis has been changed to "WG > Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up" from "Waiting for WG Chair Go-Ahead" by Kent > Watsen: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis/ >
Dear chairs, given recent discussions around ip addresses, I am not sure about the consensus and perhaps we should consider to name the new date and time types differently, e.g. date -> date-with-zone date-no-zone -> date time -> time-with-zone time-no-zone -> time to avoid similar discussions in the future and to adopt a naming style where optional elements are reflected in the name instead of using a naming style where the absence of optional parts is reflected in the name. /js -- Jürgen Schönwälder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
