Hi,
I do not find this draft useful.
I am curious about the extensions introduced.
It looks like all containers and lists are tagged as 'object'.
All config=true terminals are tagged as 'property'
and perhaps all config=false terminals are tagged as 'metric'
(although the example shows a config=true leaf 'bar' tagged as a metric)
This seems like a lot of clutter without any real value.
RFC 8819 is about functional classification (e.g. 'qos' or 'oam').
It seems this draft should just extend the granularity of the tags
to schema nodes.
>From sec 8.1:
module example-module-A {
//...
import ietf-data-node-tags { prefix ntags; }
container top {
ntags:opm-tag "ietf:object";
list X {
leaf foo {
ntags:opm-tag "ietf:property";
}
leaf bar {
ntags:opm-tag "ietf:metric";
}
}
}
// ...
}
Andy
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
