Hello Kent, On 18/05/2022 16:30, Kent Watsen wrote:
3) I wish more modules would following the pattern of having the global protocol accessible tree be defined via a "uses" of a grouping defined in the module. In another recent project, I had to hack the topology modules defined in RFC 8345 (to convert the containers to groupings) to enable a multiplicity of "abstract network topologies" to be configured. The assumption that only a single global instance is ever needed is proving to be invalid in my work time and again.
/me puts the co-author hat on.The multiplicity is already built-in into the model by the fact that network topologies is a top-level list.
Would you mind sharing the use case what requires multiplicity of the built-in multiplicity?
I know this sort-of is a re-hash of the ietf-interfaces discussion, but while there the use-case is well understood, I wonder what equivalent is there for networks/topologies.
Thanks, Robert
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
