Thanks Jurgen. I agree, I have rejected this errata.
Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> > Sent: 29 July 2022 17:21 > To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 (7062) > > Since the ipv4-address-no-zone type is derived from the ipv4-address > type and the ipv4-address type has the detailed pattern, there is no > need to repeat the details. An ipv4-address value has to satisfy both > the ipv4-address-no-zone pattern and the ipv4-address pattern. > > I believe this errata should be rejected. > > /js > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:32:27AM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6991, > > "Common YANG Data Types". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7062 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Mazhar Rana <[email protected]> > > > > Section: 4 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > typedef ipv4-address-no-zone { > > type inet:ipv4-address { > > pattern '[0-9\.]*'; > > } > > description > > "An IPv4 address without a zone index. This type, derived from > > ipv4-address, may be used in situations where the zone is > > known from the context and hence no zone index is needed."; > > } > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > typedef ipv4-address-no-zone { > > type inet:ipv4-address { > > pattern '(([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\.){3}' > > + '([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])'; > > } > > description > > "An IPv4 address without a zone index. This type, derived from > > ipv4-address, may be used in situations where the zone is > > known from the context and hence no zone index is needed."; > > } > > > > Notes > > ----- > > As per RFC 4001, dotted decimal format of IPv4 address is typically written > > in > decimal digits, formatted as four 8-bit fields that are separated by periods. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC6991 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-03) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Common YANG Data Types > > Publication Date : July 2013 > > Author(s) : J. Schoenwaelder, Ed. > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Network Modeling > > Area : Operations and Management > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > -- > Jürgen Schönwälder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
