tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls augments RFC8519 but while the RFC > structures its matches as a series of choices, the augmentation > does not. Should it?
What in practice does this mean for the YANG?
> The I-D has passed WGLC but has been delayed by me making
> editorial comments. AFAICT the I-D has not had a YANG Doctor
> review.
Seems that this should have happened.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
