Hi, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> BTW, what about using uri for key leafs (see for example RFC8345)? > > I think there are other cases where uri could be an appropriate type > to use for a key … This is fine if the leaf really is an URI. Note that no examples in RFC 8345 have valid uris. (A uri must have a valid scheme followed by a ":"). IMO using inet:uri for the keys in RFC 8345 was a mistake. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
