Well, anybody can post whatever as an I-D. Probably it is fine to just ignore this entirely for now. Of if you plan to continue to discuss this, make sure the author of the I-D is getting involved instead us speculating about things.
/js On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:21:02PM +0000, tom petch wrote: > From: Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> > Sent: 22 February 2023 10:34 > > Perhaps some bits of history. Back in the SMIv2 world, with a growing > number of MIB modules, we found it helpful to have a template for > security considerations. The OPS AD and the SEC AD back then settled > on an online template for MIB modules (which was occasionally revised > and updated). This approach was later carried over to YANG and our > YANG guidelines (RFC 8407, BCB 216) refer to the template using the > following URL: > > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines > > What might be happening right now (and here I a speculating) is that > the IETF considers to retire trac and this may have triggered to copy > text into an I-D. The reason back in a day to use an online place was > to be able to make changes easily. Looking back, changes do happen but > not very frequently, so perhaps even having the template published as > a small RFC may be workable. (Except that you never know what really > happens if you want to just make a small change to an RFC.) > > <tp> > > Thanks for that. The processes with SMI I remember well but had not thought > of the retirement of trac. Any such action would need an update to RFC8407 > IMHO which the I-D I cited quite ignores. > > Tom Petch > > /js > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:17:01AM +0000, tom petch wrote: > > From: Kent Watsen <[email protected]> > > Sent: 21 February 2023 03:34 > > > > True, that claim seems overstated and one would think that such should be > > in NETMOD. > > > > Searching OPSAWG, I don't see it. Can you provide a link? > > > > <tp> > > Do you mean for the I-D? It is > > draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext-01 > > with no indication that it is intended to touch the sides on any IETF WG. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > On Feb 20, 2023, at 12:27 PM, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I see an I-D has appeared recently with the title > > > Security Considerations Template for YANG Module Documents > > > > > > It says > > > " The text has been developed and > > > refined over many years on an Operations Area working group mailing > > > list" > > > > > > Tom Petch > > > _______________________________________________ > > > netconf mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
