Greetings Rob, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
You may review the report at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7312 Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further information on how to verify errata reports. Further information on errata can be found at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Jan 18, 2023, at 6:29 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519, > "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7312 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> > > Section: A.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > The "example-newco-acl" module is an example of a company's > proprietary model that augments the "ietf-acl" module. It shows how > to use 'augment' with an XML Path Language (XPath) expression to add > additional match criteria, actions, and default actions for when no > ACE matches are found. All these are company proprietary extensions > or system feature extensions. "example-newco-acl" is just an > example, and it is expected that vendors will create their own > proprietary models. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The "example-newco-acl" module is an example of a company's > proprietary model that augments the "ietf-access-control-list" module. It > shows how > to use 'augment' with an XML Path Language (XPath) expression to add > additional match criteria, actions, and default actions for when no > ACE matches are found. All these are company proprietary extensions > or system feature extensions. "example-newco-acl" is just an > example, and it is expected that vendors will create their own > proprietary models. > > Notes > ----- > There is no "ietf-acl" module in the document. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21) > -------------------------------------- > Title : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs) > Publication Date : March 2019 > Author(s) : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Modeling > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
