Hi Benoit, We talked about this briefly on the weekly call today. Our feeling is that it may be best to try and discuss this on the mailing list(s) for now rather than in the weekly calls. That way the entire WGs have the opportunity to be involved. The issues may have a scope that is larger than just the technical details about how to use the versioning drafts.
Jason From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Benoit Claise Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 5:58 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Pierre Francois <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: [netmod] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03.txt CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. Dear NETMOD WG, Note the change of WG from NETCONF to NETMOD Is this something that should be discussed during the Tuesday "NETMOD YANG Version Discussions " calls? Regards, Benoit -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03.txt Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:26:06 +0100 From: Alex Huang Feng <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> To: Netconf <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> CC: Pierre Francois <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Benoit Claise <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Thomas Graf <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Dear Netconf WG, I would like to raise a discussion on how this YANG module should be used and therefore if the current types are the right ones. First of all, this draft wants to address two main issues: 1. Adds the version or the semver in the stablish-subscription and modify-subscription rpcs to allow selecting the versionned YANG module in YANG-push 2. Adds the version and the semver in the subscription-started and subscription-modified notifications and the subscription datastore to have the version and the semver in them. My concern is the following: In the rpc, the current “revision" is a "rev:revision-date-or-label", meaning that in the “revision” leaf you can chose either the revision “2020-01-10” or the semver “1.0.0”. Should this be “rev:revision-date” instead? I am asking myself which is the wanted use-case of the different leaves. I understand that if the "revision-label" is used, there is no need for the “revision” (in the subscription rpc)? On the notification side, I do think both are necessary, but the same issue, the “revision” should maybe be “rev:revision-date”. Two ways to solve this: 1. in the rpc: the "revision" being “rev:revision-date” and the "revision-label” be “ysver:version” in the notifications and datastore: the revision being “rev:revision-date” and the "revision-label” be “ysver:version” OR 2. in the rpc: only having “revision” leaf being “rev:revision-date-or-label” and removing "revision-label" leaf. in the notifications and datastore: the "revision" being “rev:revision-date” and the "revision-label” be “ysver:version” Does this make sense? What are your thoughts? Regards, Alex Huang Feng On 17 Jan 2023, at 15:43, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Dear netconf wg, We addressed in section 4.2 a copy paste error on the yang module and published the document in the -03 version. Best wishes Thomas A new version of I-D, draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Thomas Graf and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning Revision: 03 Title: Support of Versioning in YANG Notifications Subscription Document date: 2023-01-17 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 15 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03 Abstract: This document extends the YANG notifications subscription mechanism to specify the YANG module semantic version at the subscription. Then, a new extension with the revision and the semantic version of the YANG push subscription state change notification is proposed. The IETF Secretariat -----Original Message----- From: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-HCS Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2023 7:27 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Pierre Francois <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; Alex Huang Feng <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; Benoit Claise <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-02.txt Dear netconf wg, On top of the changes in the -01 version based on inputs from IETF 115 from of Jason Stern and Rob Wilton, we added in section 4.1.2 the YANG full tree view, added descriptions and resolved some issues in the YANG module raised by the YANG validation. On the behalf of the authors I like to request the adoption of the document to the netconf working group and request a slot at IETF 116 to present an update, discuss and conclude how to progress on subscription id being mandatory. Best wishes Thomas
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
